In a development that could reshape Indo-U.S. trade dynamics, former U.S. President Donald Trump has announced 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, effective June 4, 2025. This measure, aimed at boosting domestic manufacturing under the pretext of national security, threatens India’s substantial metal exports to the U.S. worth $5 billion.
As trade tensions rise, India is now evaluating its options, balancing between assertiveness and diplomacy. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has stepped in with strategic guidance on navigating this evolving scenario.
Understanding the Impact on India
The newly announced tariffs fall under the controversial Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act, which permits tariffs on the grounds of national security. For India, these duties could deal a major blow to its steel and aluminum export sector, which has been steadily growing over the past decade. The move has sparked concern within India’s trade and policy circles.
GTRI’s Strategic Recommendations
In a recent policy note, the GTRI advised India to adopt a pragmatic and diplomatic approach rather than a confrontational one. The organization urges New Delhi to incorporate tariff-related discussions into ongoing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations with the United States. The logic is simple—use India’s growing market as leverage to persuade the U.S. to roll back the tariffs.
Retaliation vs Diplomacy: India’s Options
While the idea of retaliatory tariffs or approaching the World Trade Organization (WTO) exists, both paths carry potential setbacks:
- Retaliatory tariffs may invite countermeasures from the U.S., worsening bilateral ties.
- A WTO case could be a long-drawn battle with uncertain outcomes, especially after the U.S. dismissed India’s earlier petition, claiming national security exceptions as the basis for the tariffs.
Key Data Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| U.S. Tariff Announcement Date | Effective June 4, 2025 |
| Tariff Rate | 50% on steel and aluminum imports |
| Impact on Indian Exports | Threatens $5 billion worth of steel and aluminum exports |
| Legal Basis of Tariffs (U.S.) | Section 232 – National Security |
| GTRI’s Main Recommendation | Address in FTA talks; avoid direct confrontation |
| Retaliation Option | Retaliatory tariffs—risky and potentially escalatory |
| Legal Option via WTO | WTO dispute possible but complex; U.S. already dismissive |
| U.S. Response to WTO Challenge | Rejected India’s petition citing national security |
Conclusion: A Delicate Diplomatic Balancing Act
India stands at a crucial juncture where its response to U.S. metal tariffs could either protect its economic interests or deepen trade rifts. Following the GTRI’s roadmap, New Delhi may choose to prioritize negotiation over escalation, integrating tariff discussions into broader trade talks and leveraging its significance as a growing market.
As the global trade order shifts with rising protectionism, India must play its cards wisely—defending its industries without compromising its long-term diplomatic and economic relationships.
Glottis Limited 
Leave a comment