India is set to revise its retaliatory tariff proposal against the United States, reigniting trade tensions initially sparked during the Trump administration. The move comes under the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework, following the US decision to increase tariffs on imported steel (from 25% to 50%) and aluminum, citing national security concerns.

This revision is not just a procedural update—it’s a strategic economic move in the midst of ongoing Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations between the two nations.

---

Key Data at a Glance

Key Factor	Details
Reason for Tariffs	US imposed increased tariffs on steel (25% → 50%) and aluminum
India’s Response	Revising retaliatory duties under WTO norms
WTO Involvement	India notified WTO of its right to revise tariff rates
Financial Impact	Duties target $7.6 billion worth of US imports
Projected Duty Revenue	Estimated $3.82 billion in duties to be collected
Previous Measures	India had imposed customs duties on 28 US products
WTO Complaint	India had filed a formal trade dispute complaint against US at WTO
Current Context	Proposal revision coincides with BTA talks and diplomatic negotiations
Upcoming Events	Indian officials scheduled to visit Washington for trade talks
Historical Trigger	US invoked “national security” to justify steel and aluminum tariffs

---

Implications: Economic Strategy or Diplomatic Signal?

The proposed revision underscores India’s efforts to balance strategic trade interests with diplomatic engagement. The financial implications are significant, with nearly $3.82 billion in additional duties expected if the new proposal is enforced.

The move also serves as a strong negotiating card ahead of the Bilateral Trade Agreement discussions, signaling India’s intent to protect its interests while engaging through proper multilateral channels.

---

Looking Forward

As Indian trade officials prepare to engage with their US counterparts in Washington, this revision could either serve as a stepping stone toward resolving long-standing trade issues or risk further escalating tensions. What remains clear is that India is asserting its stance firmly within the global trade framework while preparing for a future where fair, rules-based trade is prioritized.